Top of The
Morning by Brian Stelter by Kate Johns, Guest Reviewer
When I saw
the stories on Yahoo telling what horrid things Ann Curry went through after
working for the NBC Today show for over fifteen years, I was more than
intrigued by the story. That’s when I made haste to get a copy of Top of the
Morning. After reading several chapters, I found I had woken from a fifteen
minute nap when my head was doing that head bobbing thing, and my book had
fallen to the floor.
Top of the
Morning is overall a dull book. It reads like the writer does not know how to
tell a story, and Gee, I thought that was what writers were supposed to do. The
book was supposed to be about all the morning shows which would have made it more
interesting if this had been the case, but it wasn’t. It was a hodgepodge of
mismatched chapters that quite frankly didn’t make sense in their order.
Although it
was interesting to get the inside scoop on what happened to Ann Curry after she
was fired and replaced on the Today Show, this book wasn’t an interesting read.
Even though Brian Stelter tried to make it sound like he was right there
experiencing what was going on when The Today Show started moving Ann Curry out
of the limelight, it still came off as the author was not right there, and for
all we know, he could have made it all up. I’m also certain that Ann Curry
isn’t allowed to talk about what really happened with the Today Show shoving
her out of the uncomfortable nest. She has been retained with NBC as a foreign
correspondent, and pops up from time to time. From what I read in Top of the
Morning, Curry has a four year contract with NBC for five million a year.
This book
did tell what happened to Curry and how the producers started planning on
getting rid of her almost as soon as she started as Matt Lauer’s co-host.
Stelter said they called the firing of Curry as, “Operation Bambi.” Then they
proceeded to treat her like garbage until they essentially fired her.
After
reading what happened to Ann Curry in Top of the Morning, this book became very
boring. In fact it felt like I was suddenly thrust into reading a history book.
The author starts telling the history of television’s morning shows with Dan
Hartman and Joan Lunden. I was wrapped up in the story of what happened to Ann
Curry and what was happening on the Today Show, that to suddenly switch gears
like that became a bore fest. It’s like you are sitting in the backseat of an
expensive limo, drinking fine wine, when suddenly the limo driver stops the
vehicle with a squeal of the brakes. He jumps out, opens your door, tells you
to get out of the limo and leaves you stranded there.
That’s how
Top of The Morning reads: it goes along at an interesting fast pace, you are
served decent reading fare, and suddenly you are stopped in your tracks. The
best part of the story ends. Suddenly the author throws in a boring history
lesson on morning TV, and then slightly entices readers again by talking about
the absolutely idiotic morning TV show called, “Morning Joe.” I tried watching
Morning Joe a year ago, and soon found staring at the only female anchor on the
show became too boring. I was left wondering, ‘does this woman know how to talk
or have any idea what is going on in the world?’ All I saw her do was say,
“Coming up next and we need to do a commercial break.”
Top of the
Morning became a dull read all too soon, and needed more information on what
happened to Ann Curry. The main point here is when you are writing a book, you
need to tell a story. When the story ends after 125 pages into the book and
switches gears ending the story, which can lead to aggravating the reader. I
also noticed besides changing gears midstream and ending the more interesting
story, was the author lacked a real sense of what was going on. Most writers
who are really good at their craft will write in a descriptive manner. Stephen
King describes everything and he does it all in this scary, nasty way that
makes a reader wanting that next move. Readers are waiting to be scared.
When a
writer does not describe details of how the set looks on a morning talk show,
or what the morning hosts are wearing, that says that the author really was not
there witnessing what took place. That says the author lacks a magical sense of
imagination. Top of the Morning also lacked an identifiable written voice. Most
authors will tell a story in a certain voice. When I write most of my articles,
stories, blog posts, I write in a certain voice, like I am talking to a friend.
This book lacked a certain voice. Brian Stelter lacked a certain voice,
imagination and it really seemed that he was not witnessing what really
happened. Anyone can watch TV and analyze it. But the trick here should have
been for Stelter to bring the audience in by writing in a certain voice, using
more imagination, and perhaps doing more than just watching TV.