After
reading former Missouri State Senator Jeff Smith’s account of his time behind
bars, Mr. Smith Goes to Prison: What My
Year Behind Bars Taught Me About America's Prison Crisis, I can only
conclude one of two things; that most of the people who are incarcerated in the
United States did absolutely nothing wrong or that Smith has never heard of
personal responsibility.
I choose to
conclude that Smith, a self-confessed (in the book; liar and thief) must have
missed school the day they taught personal responsibility. Smith is typical of
so many iron-clad liberals who believe that someone or something else is at
fault for people’s individual problems; society has held those behind bars
down, the “prison industrial complex” perpetuates the recidivism of those
behind bars and no one is responsible for the bad choices they have made.
Smith
appears to think that he is really only guilty of getting caught breaking
federal election laws and lying about it. In the book Smith admits that he “borrowed”
copy-righted material from Kaplan Test Prep, a former employer of his, in an
effort to assist talented athletes who struggled to make the academic
qualifications to earn a college scholarship. Smith reasons that he only
charged $50 to the jocks while Kaplan wanted $1000 and justifies it by claiming
“Kaplan was doing just fine” and “Kaplan wasn’t losing business, no one was
getting hurt.” In other words, the ends, justifies the means.
Smith can’t
even bring himself to admit that he did anything wrong. Late in the book he
recounts a visit from his parents and when his mother confronts him about being
reckless he concludes “it definitely wasn’t the time to say so, ‘Look, Mom, I didn’t actually do anything wrong…”
So based
upon his extensive experience with the United States justice system, one year
and one day behind bars, what is Smith’s plan to reform that system? Smith reasons
that taxpayers could save billions of dollars annually if instead of
incarcerating non-violent offenders we simply tracked them via electronic
monitoring. Smith neglects to detail exactly what the costs would be for the
monitoring and who would do that monitoring. In most current instances the
offender is charged the cost of the monitoring; is that what he proposes for
the criminals he expresses such deep concern for now? He worries about
offenders who get jailed for not meeting their parental responsibilities of
paying to support their children, and now he wants to add the cost of ankle
bracelet monitoring?
Perhaps a
better way to break the cycle of generational imprisonment would be to prevent
liberals from perpetuating failed social programs that once purported to give a
hand up and have now become a business. Perhaps by placing a time limit on
these social programs folks will be motivated to earn a living and take care of
themselves and their families. It seems that welfare reform programs pushed by
Republicans were working and the poverty pimps on the left felt they were more
compassionate by foisting perpetual “benefits” and Obama phones on the poor. Is
it any wonder that folks lack the motivation to do the right thing like get an
education and earn a living?
While Smith
tries to describe how awful life in prison was for him, perhaps if it was made
to be the worst possible experience you could imagine, then people would be
motivated to never ever wanting to go back. Just a thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment