Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Required Reading for Reporters


Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World and Why Things Are Better Than You Think – Hans Rosling (Flatiron)

Here is a test: I challenge you to head down to your favorite big box bookstore and take a look around, I will bet that you will no problem finding shelves and shelves of books on the power of positive thought. The challenge is to try to find one, just one book that will help you be better at being negative. Here’s a hint…you won’t find even one, because no one needs a book to tell them how to be negative, because it’s an almost natural inclination.

Dr. Hans Rosling, a medical doctor, professor of international health and regular participant in TED Talks addresses the phenomena of ten instincts he categorizes, that dictate and some cases distort our perspective on the world around us in his new book Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World and Why Things Are Better Than You Think.


All too often writers or thinkers are describe as influential because they impact what we think; Rosling has really set out to impact or influence how we think. So much of what we are subjected to in the ways of influence is based on the bias of the influencers and it becomes all too often a case of garbage in garbage out. Rosling makes the case that when you are pre-disposed to thinking negatively then that influence will simply reinforce that thought process in a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This book should become required reading for anyone who wants to pursue a career in journalism. With the non-stop, 24/7 news cycle, the Twitiots, Facebook and so much more is it any wonder that we have seen the rise of fake news. Often all it takes is a dose of not-so-common sense and critical thought to cut through the bias and raise questions about what is being served up by the influencer class.

Rosling does a great job of dialing down the rhetoric and our natural instincts, to put things into perspective that is free of bias and actually based in fact…or in this case Factfulness.

No comments: